RESEARCH
PUBLICATIONS
PEOPLE
CONTACT
LAB NEWS
INTERNAL
RESEARCH
PUBLICATIONS
PEOPLE
CONTACT
LAB NEWS
INTERNAL
RSS button

the latest news




Bug hunting

Sean and Josh retrieving insects from the net
Jamey with a net full of clover stem weevils
Clover stem weevil on clover


Clover stem weevil on clover
Clover stem weevil on clover
Clover stem weevil on clover




clockwise from upper-right:
clover stem weevil Ischnopterapion virens, in situ
red aphids
a schizophorid fly
another schizophorid fly
Jamey with a net full of clover stem weevils
Josh and Sean scan for pootworthy insects.

Entomology day in the lab. We spent a couple hours in the afternoon a few blocks away from the lab, at the North Point Park.

~ Aim #1: sample some of the local insect species, with Josh and Sean wielding the net and pooter. Success – we caught a few dozen species (at least) in the orders Collembola, Odonata, Hemiptera, Trichoptera, Lepidoptera, Diptera, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, and a few stray Acarina.

~ Aim #2: establish new wild drosophilids stocks for our experiments. Success possible – 15 different individual flies, each looking drosophilish, are incubating on our fly food. We’ll see what takes.

~ Aim #3: collect a batch of clover stem weevils Ischnopterapion virens (Herbst, 1797). Success – we’ve chosen this species for some thorough phototactic behavior experiments, as they are wild, non-Dipteran, locally abundant, and of the right physical dimensions to fit into FlyVac. Therefore they serve as a nice outgroup control for our fruit flies.


June 28, 2011 on 4:47 am    ~    1 Comment


Welcome to the lab

We are glad to bring on board two new members of the lab for the summer: 

  • Bruno Afonso comes to us from Aravi Samuel’s lab after finishing his graduate studies in Pam Silver’s lab in Harvard’s Systems Biology Department. His project in the Samuel lab is to head up the phototaxis events of the Larval Fly Olympiad at Janelia Farms, screening Gerry Rubin’s collection of very specific Gal4 lines for effects on phototaxis. He is visiting our lab for the summer to build his rigs and get up to speed on the genetics of his screen before heading down to Ashburn.
  • Josh Chapman is a pre-med undergrad at Harvard’s extension school, and has joined the lab as a volunteer to work with Sean on his gait plasticity project. Specifically, they are investigating the extent to which injured flies exhibit deficits in their walking behavior (and to what extent they can then recover from these injuries) using a modified version of Buridan’s Assay.
  • Also, congratulations to Sarah Zhang ’11!


June 21, 2011 on 2:42 am    ~    No Comments


Drosophila Research Conference – San Diego, CA

poster hall at Drosophila meeting 2010
pelicans in san diego
Jamey's central complex temporary tattoo
vertebrate-neuron-shaped kelp
lobula-plate-shaped tangle of kelp holdfasts




clockwise from upper-right:
neuron-shaped kelp (sadly, it’s a vertebrate neuron),
lobula-plate-shaped tangle of kelp holdfast,
Jamey’s central complex tattoo,
pelicans over the beach,
the vast poster hall.

Our first big Drosophila meeting, with Jamey, Sean and Ben in attendance. The meeting began with an award for John Carlson and a nice tag-team historical lecture by Stephen Goodwin, Scott Waddell and Michael Roshbash. Highlights of the breakout sessions included an explosion of new genetic and genomic reagents from the likes of Hugo Bellen and lab friend Bing Zhang. In the Emerging Arthropod Model Systems session, Nipam Patel presented beautiful work on the developmental genetics of the crustacean Parhyale, which highlighted the modularity of limb identity in crustaceans (no wonder arthropods were the first metazoans to terrestrialize, back in the Paleozoic!). Eric Wieschaus closed the meeting with a talk presenting a biophysical model of gastrulation in which the topological involution of mesodermal cells appears not to depend on cellularization, but instead on the viscoelasticity of the intracellular space.

Sean’s poster on locomotor handedness in flies won a blue ribbon for the best post-doc poster at the meeting, garnering a nice cash prize, a compilation of Ed Lewis’ papers and a set of DVD interviews of various geneticists. Go Sean!

[Ben's aside:] I think every biologist should be required to go to a zoo periodically – they’re awesome. We skipped a morning session of the meeting to go the San Diego Zoo. Some of our favorite animals were the otters, okapis, condors, secretarybirds (which seem to be evolving back into dromaeosaurs. They are already cursorial predators with long stabilizing tails – I expect to see a stabbing/slashing claw in the next million years or so), and Clyde the orangutan. Here’s an amazing video of a different orangutan rescuing a stranded baby bird from water.


April 10, 2011 on 12:00 am    ~    No Comments


Janelia Conference: Vision in Flies – Ashburn, VA



Sean, Ben and Liz headed down the east coast to Ashburn, Virginia, and the campus (and IKEA-inspired James Bond villain lair) of HHMI’s Janelia Farm Research Campus. The meeting topic was vision in flies, narrowed this year to focus on physiology and behavior to the partial exclusion of developmental talks. The star of the show was the Elementary Motion Detector, and its instantiation in the lamina and lobula plate of the fly brain. Is the EMD a Reichardt detector? Seems likely. Will science identify neurons corresponding to all of its components? Yes, probably, and probably within the next 5-10 years.

The earthquake in Japan delayed the arrival of the keynote speaker, Dale Purvis, and his talk about how visual illusions are not errors in perception, but adaptations to the statistical structure of natural scenes. The ensuing scheduling shuffle moved Ben’s talk from the very last slot to the very first, the upside of which was many more opportunities to discuss fly phototactic personality with attendees including Martin Heisenberg, Ian Meinertzhagen, Vivek Jayaraman and Michael Reiser.

The wildlife at Janelia is abundant – deer in the meadows; frogs, water-striders, Canada geese, great blue herons, and hooded mergansers on the pond, and dragon flies on the pond and in the Leonardo lab.


March 20, 2011 on 12:00 am    ~    No Comments


The Odysseus Experiment

It turns out that while a particular species may, on average, perform a particular way in a behavioral assay, individuals often deviate quite significantly from the species or strain average. Sean has been investigating individual variation in handed behaviors, such as choosing between alternative tunnels in a branching maze, and Jamey has been investigating a comparable phenomenon using the flies’ startled light response as the behavioral assay. Since the 8th of November, Jamey and Ben have been working on identifying the time points in development during which individual flies acquire behavioral idiosyncrasies – fly personality. This experiment is grueling, as it has required testing the light choice behavior of 30 experimental groups, containing 50-150 animals each, up to 40 times per animal, over the course of 30 days.

Each of these animals has been tested, individually, in The FlyVac Device (see May, 2010 lab news entry), which has been in continuous operation since Thanksgiving. The scale of this can be visualized by the pile of fly corpses at the bottom of the alcohol morgue (photo at left, middle). Each of the nearly 2,000 flies shown there was individually loaded into a phototactic module, allowed to behave freely for up to half a day, and then removed and sacrificed. Diligent record keeping has been required so that we can keep straight the particular manipulations and fly pushing required each day (see the photo of our experimental calendar with days on the x-axis, at left, below). Early on Jamey characterized this experiment as Odyssean, rather than Herculean, since it lasts seemingly indefinitely and requires a continual grind of exertion, rather than an acute burst. Soon though, we hope it will yield the anchor piece of data for a nice publication.


November 25, 2010 on 12:00 am    ~    No Comments


Beetle box

beetle box
The concept of behavioral diversity is hard to convey visually. But, this collection of beetles from Madagascar gives us a starting point. It contains 102 different species, which make up approximately 0.025% of all described beetle species, 0.0064% of all described eukaryotic species, and perhaps 0.001% of all extant species. Even though beetles are one of four hyper-diversified insect lineages, any collection of one hundred species, as closely related as these, would show a comparable level of morphological variation. And yet, despite the striking visual diversity of these animals, their behavioral diversity in life was equal or greater; every sexual species is capable of at least one behavior unique among all animals – the selective identification and courtship of other members of its own species. Sometimes it is only behavior that distinguishes (and maintains as separate species) taxa that are, to first approximation, morphologically identical. Cicadas with out-of-phase broods, or crickets with different songs are classic examples. So, any visual representation of morphological diversity equally conveys behavioral diversity, if not an underestimate of it.

On the topic of the study of behavioral diversity, we are very glad to welcome Sarah Zhang (Harvard 2011) into the lab for her neuroscience thesis research this fall and spring. Sarah began her work this summer by optimizing our apparatus for measuring the light preference of flies at rest, and is planning to look for differences in this behavior between natural populations of flies.

[Ben's aside:] In putting this display together this weekend, I was taken by the particular beauty of each specimen. Without exception there were fascinating details in every one of them – high contrast iridescent patterning on their underbellies, seemingly arbitrary folds and indentations in their elytra, compound eyes engulfing the basal segments of the antennae, etc. From my own experience working on the taxonomy of the mite harvestmen (Opiliones: Cyphophthalmi) with Gonzalo Giribet, I know even the most drab, unassuming, uncharismatic creatures become subtle works of evolutionary beauty and intricacy when you have studied them in detail. While there may only be a few dozen scientists in the world that can name off the top of their head the species names of any of these specimens, each species could be the worthy basis of a full lifetime’s career of research.

August 1, 2010 on 12:00 am    ~    No Comments



Gordon Research Conference: Genes & Behavior – Ventura, CA

Arriving in San Francisco a couple days before the conference, we visited our respective families a bit before starting the Pacific coast highway road trip from Concord to Ventura. Trip highlights: local sourdough bread, artichoke soup, dungeness crab and berry pie at Duarte’s in Pescadero – seals, tide pools, and beach combing at Bean Hollow Beach – Big Sur – stargazing in San Simeon – hiking and wild aloe plants in Cayucos – breakfast in San Luis Obispo – hiking the groves and beaches of Goleta – vegan dinner in Santa Barbara.

We met up with Liz at the conference site, as well as her friend Johanna Kowalko, who studies the evolution of behavior in cavefish in Cliff Tabin’s lab. The meeting was well paced, with plenty of time to mingle with the other attendees and peruse the research posters on the first two days. Local excursions filled the afternoon in the last two days, including a wine-tasting tour on which we caught, and started a wild-isolate stock from, an enophilic female Drosophila. Jamey presented his work on mapping the loci underlying strain differences in phototaxis behavior – Sean, his results demonstrating plasticity in fly walking behavior following injury – Ben, the current status of the apparatus for capturing single-fly walking motion and leg position – Liz, her results characterizing the negative phototaxis of young larval Drosophila.

On Thursday afternoon, St. Patrick’s Day, we met up with our old friend from graduate school, Jae Hur. He is studying the genetics of aging in Drosophila in David Walker’s lab at UCLA. The visit included a trip to Ventura harbor where we watched large waves breaking as the sun set over the Channel Islands, and live music with mexican dinner.


March 15, 2010 on 12:00 am    ~    No Comments


CSHL Meeting on Neurobiology of Drosophila – Cold Spring Harbor, NY

At our first meeting as a lab, we were treated to a wide variety of research results from the neurobiology of Drosophila field. There were many behavioral, and comparatively few developmental talks. Notable topics included the light sensitivity of the fly retina, wing-extension as a behavior dependent on the animals’ spatial perception, specifically ordered grooming of the face and body following a coating of dust, highly non-additive interactions of long-term-memory alleles, and the interconnectivity of glia-defined brain regions. Gerry Rubin presented the current goings-on at Janelia Farm, stirring up the cultural divide between big/automated science and more traditional/intimate research. Jamey presented his results on phototactic differences between Drosophila simulans strains, and initial progress toward QTL mapping these differences. Ben showed the preliminary results of the leg-tracking apparatus, which was well received, and led to a number of interesting suggestions, such as analyzing the effect of injury on gait. This meeting was also the deep end of the Drosophila pool into which Sean was thrown, making up his first four days after joining the lab.

October 5, 2009 on 12:00 am    ~    No Comments